It is a recognized phenomenon that anywhere from a few months to a year after an Oscars presentation, you can't remember what movie or director won.
This will not be true for 2010.
"There is no other way to describe this. It's the moment of a lifetime. First of all -- this is so extraordinary to be in the company of such powerful -- my fellow nominees -- such powerful film makers who have inspired me and I have admired for -- some of whom -- for decades. Thank you to every member of the Academy. This is again the moment of a lifetime."
It was so immensely satisfying to see Kathryn Bigelow win her award, and realize that history and symbolism notwithstanding, her being a woman was also incidental. She was being acknowledged for a job well done. The honor was just.
This year's Academy Awards were unusual as well for being, despite the weak start and the bloated length, such enjoyable cultural comfort food. At a time when our country rarely does any one thing together - our communally watching a live show in real time has become, outside of sports on TV, an odd, almost retro event - the Oscars fulfilled a kind of American ideal.
A good guy won, and spent his speech time essentially thanking his mom and dad (The Dude abides); our best actress was as smack-dab-in-the-center American in persona as a gal can be. Mo'Nique, embodying the American dream sensibility endemic to the event, addressed her husband ("Thank you for showing me that sometimes you have to forego doing what's popular in order to do what's right. And baby, you were so right.") Sandra Bullock homaged her mom with a similar bent: "She said... There’s no race, no religion, no class system, no color, nothing, no sexual orientation that makes us better than anyone else. We are all deserving of love."
When Barbra Streisand introduced Kathryn Bigelow's win with, "Well, the time has come," it was hard to be a cynic. It felt un-conflictedly good, for once, to be us. The David v. Goliath victory of The Hurt Locker over Avatar - celebrated in the wake of so many unsuccessful movies about a war we didn't want to go to the movies to see - became an embrace of what we Americans like to feel is best in us.
"... I'd like to dedicate this to the women and men in the military who risk their lives on a daily basis in Iraq and Afghanistan and around the world and may they come home safe. Thank you," Bigelow ended her Best Director speech.
Ms. Bullock's wind-up was funnier ("I thank you so much for this opportunity that I share with these extraordinary women and my lover Meryl Streep”). But the close of Bigelow's acceptance for Best Picture drove the theme home:
"Perhaps one more dedication. To men and women all over the world who — sorry to reiterate — but wear a uniform, not just the military — HazMat, emergency, firemen. They are there for us, and we are there for them."
For a couple of minutes there, you felt - and how strange to experience it while peering into the belly of the show biz beast! - that this was true.
Evidently the Academy, once in a while, can actually get it right.
What jingoistic claptrap. The pro-war movie beat the anti-war movie and you all applaud like David beat Goliath. And up is down and down is up.
Posted by: Rob | March 08, 2010 at 05:37 AM
http://madamearcati.blogspot.com/2010/03/hurt-locker-six-oscars-for-propaganda.html
Posted by: Rob | March 08, 2010 at 05:41 AM
I LOVE the Oscars. Every year I watch them, eyes rivited to the TV set. I want to work with so many of those people up there; the best of the best.
I'm glad Katherine Bigelow won. Moment of a lifetime for her. True, I'm not the biggest fan of "The Hurt Locker," but everyone deserves a moment of triumph.
Best part of the night continues to be when fellow piers of the nominees for best lead actor and actress laud the nominees. I don't know why I like that so much, but I find it moving. Glad to see they kept it.
- E.C. Henry from Bonney Lake, WA
Posted by: E.C Henry | March 08, 2010 at 07:44 AM
Rob: First time in my life I've ever been called "jingoistic," but I hear where you're coming from.
Ironically, my subtext (which evidently didn't come across) was that I'm usually critical of such "isn't it great to live in our great democracy?" shows, but that for once, I felt in accord with the sentiment.
Still, I don't see how one can argue that a low-budget, relatively little-seen movie about an unpopular subject is the Goliath that beat out a history-making billion-dollar juggernaut (David). Down is still down and up is still up on that score, no matter what your politics are.
Further: Thanks for the link, which is a thought-provoking read.
Personally, I don't see LOCKER as flawless, but I do like the idea of a war story that's about defusing bombs (i.e. protecting the lives of soldiers), as opposed to being about "let's kick ass and destroy the other guys." Which AVATAR, by the way, spent an inordinate amount of screen time on (Oh, it's awful, all that big evil technology blowing things up! Now let's watch more things get blown up more spectacularly, due to the wonders of technology!).
I enjoyed AVATAR and support its (simplistic but effective) green message, but it's "anti-war" in the same way that so many violent movies are "against violence."
EC: I also liked the moments where peers appreciated peers. Thought Bullock's speech was especially gracious in that respect.
Posted by: mernitman | March 08, 2010 at 11:09 AM
There's nothing pro-war about Hurt Locker. The film assiduously stuck to the men who diffuse bombs -- as opposed to killing people -- for a reason. If you don't want to look at the lives of those people, that's fine, but at no point does the film take a position on the war. It does take a position on suffering, violence, what war does to a person's spirit and ability to live in the world after war (cross-reference Richard Thompson's "How Will I Ever Be Simple Again" -- hardly a pro-war song).
Being against the war is different than being against the warriors themselves -- most of them painfully young men and women who are doing what we (yes, we -- we're all responsible) asked them to do. Watching Hurt Locker reminded me about a speech I heard at the Bioneers conference by Edward Tick (http://www.soldiersheart.net). Our warriors have stories to tell. If we want to end war, we ought to be listening. Bigelow's movie gives us one chance to do that.
Posted by: Judith Lewis | March 08, 2010 at 04:04 PM
re: "communally watching a live show in real time has become, outside of sports on TV, an odd, almost retro event"
American Idol? - Mark
Posted by: Maestro | March 08, 2010 at 07:11 PM
Okay, Billy, maybe for you, "...When Barbra Streisand introduced Kathryn Bigelow's win with, 'Well, the time has come,' it was hard to be a cynic," but moments later, when the band started playing "I Am Woman," I found that being a cynic came quite easily.
Posted by: Frank Conniff | March 08, 2010 at 11:51 PM
Judith: What you said. And thanks for the link!
Maestro: Damn, you got me. But I should answer - Like I said: sports on TV.
Frank: They played what?! I was too busy being all PC-choked up and all to hear (or smell) the bad taste.
Posted by: mernitman | March 09, 2010 at 10:11 AM
I agree "I Am Woman" was totally weird.
Posted by: Judith Lewis | March 09, 2010 at 12:34 PM
Rob is right![[[thumbs up]]]
Here's the thing: America's 'heros' could be considered other people's 'terrorists' since America is/has been the aggressors in both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. For me the better film is definately AVATAR... but then I'm not American(neither is James Cameron by birth, incidentally).
But I have a question, why do people like to applaud people on the basis of being the first from of a 'group' rather than if the actual work warrants the applause? (It reminds me of the year when a corrupt, unqualified and unintelligent woman became the first female prime minister of Jamaica- fortunately it didn't last very long).
Her film, Miss Bigalow's, was only championed because of people's jealousy of James Cameron's success and the fact that she's his ex wife; another year and I doubt 'the hurt locker' would've even be on the radar.
Posted by: JamminGirl | March 09, 2010 at 08:27 PM
Jammin: Sorry - I'm getting unreasonably over-heated re: this topic, but - I don't think it had anything to do with "jealousy." My being moved by this movie had nothing to do with Bigelow's relationship to Cameron. You seem to be reacting to everything else but the movie itself. And how sexist is it, to wholly perceive this situation on the basis of gender roles?!
Have you seen HURT LOCKER? Do you think her direction was weak? Unskilled? It was a brilliant piece of moviemaking, whether Bigelow was a woman, man, or dolphin. I'm tired of this backlash being framed as a LOCKER v. AVATAR issue (there were 8 other films nominated, after all). I stand behind my acknowledgment of Bigelow's achievement as a job well done, on its own terms.
Posted by: mernitman | March 09, 2010 at 10:09 PM
You said it so well, mernitman. The Hurt Locker was hardly pro-war and the choice between the movies was not about the Exes or the sexes. I adored Avatar--sat long after it ended and wanted to return to that world. Hurt Locker didn't grab me in that way, despite my nearly having a stroke (literally--blood pressure a way up) in the first few scenes. But A. wandered out of control, while H.L. was tight and brilliantly directed. Think we could look at the writing...and see the difference.
Posted by: Patty | March 10, 2010 at 02:06 PM
I wrote a long reply but it may elicit a more heated response than is warranted or than I'd even intended to draw.
Anyways she won but 'feh'; I'm not impressed. Life goes on...
Posted by: JamminGirl | March 10, 2010 at 08:12 PM
I've been a fan of Kathryn Bigelow since I saw ,'Point Break'.I know most people write it off,but I grew up in the surfing community and knew how real those guys were.Surfing,sky diving and a whole lotta good looking men shooting each other.Now that's action and I was really chuffed to think that a woman directed it.Also I think only a woman would know how good Keanu Reeves would look in the rain in a tight blue t-shirt.I've been lucky enough to get my hands on the screenplay of ,'The Hurt Locker'and it's incredible,the film has only just started here in Aust,I'll be seeing it this week.I love that she won the Oscar.You're right Billy,all the right things happened this time.
Posted by: Judith Duncan | March 10, 2010 at 11:36 PM
Wow, heated in here. What's that about Billy's one of the nicer, thoughtful people on the Internet.
I didn't get to see it yet but the trailers looked excellent. And we are talking about the person who made Near Dark. I saw it recently and it definitely held up.
I didn't feel that Avatar was "complex" enough to win. Best Picture is the amalgam of everything. Best Director is nearly as they will make or break the film.
Admittedly I just read a good part of Precious and no way should that have won.
I believe it was Kathryn who said judge me as a film maker not a female film maker.
Posted by: Christian H | March 13, 2010 at 02:40 PM
Why is it that, on a SCREENWRITING blog, you fail to mention the first African American to win for screenwriting while you focus on a woman winning Best Director?
Posted by: Lesley Jordan | March 13, 2010 at 04:50 PM
Patty: "Look at the writing" (that would be Mark Boal's) - What a thought.
Jammin: It does go on. Thank goodness.
Judith: POINT BREAK! Be curious to see it again.
Christian: Yeah, the heat is on. We live in interesting times.
Lesley: I'm sorry for the oversight. To answer your question, I failed to mention Fletcher because I was primarily fixated on Bigelow and LOCKER when I posted Sunday night (so much so, that I didn't even mention Oscar winner Mark Boal; I thought about it, but his win didn't seem relevant to my post). Not to have mentioned the historic aspect of Fletcher's award was myopic of me.
You should be gratified to see that because this is in good part a SCREENWRITING blog, as you say, I always list the screenwriter, not the director, in my "Films Seen Recently" sidebar (note Mr. Fletcher's name, which has been there all week). But since you bring it up:
Living the RomCom is not solely a SCREENWRITING blog. I write about many other things here (check the banner at the top for details), including FICTION and the WRITING LIFE and MUSIC and MOVIES IN GENERAL and GENDER RELATIONS and my PERSONAL LIFE, so if on occasion, my posts are not entirely focused on SCREENWRITING... that's my prerogative. Can we still be friends?
Posted by: mernitman | March 13, 2010 at 06:09 PM
Yes, we can still be friends. I was just (really) surprised at the oversight.
I still love your blog and your book Writing the Romantic Comedy.
Posted by: Lesley Jordan | March 18, 2010 at 07:04 PM
Thank you, Lesley - Onward and upward with the arts!
Posted by: mernitman | March 18, 2010 at 08:49 PM
Liked you on Facebook, too. =)
Posted by: moncler netherland | November 03, 2011 at 02:48 AM